Secondary stock market liquidity and the cost of issuing seasoned equity

Union Jack
Dannebrog

Secondary stock market liquidity and the cost of issuing seasoned equity

Show full item record

Title: Secondary stock market liquidity and the cost of issuing seasoned equity
European evidence
Author: Bundgaard, Kristian D.; Ahm, Jonas
Abstract: This thesis finds that secondary market liquidity is an important and significant predictor of the combined cost of issuing seasoned equity. Firms with more liquid shares are on average able to issue new equity at lower costs than their less liquid counterparts. This relation is interpreted as economically meaningful and important. The intricate and multifaceted concept of market liquidity is explained and discussed along with the wide variety of measures in existence to capture and quantify it. The total costs of a seasoned equity offering (SEO) are argued to consist of direct and indirect costs. The direct cost refers primarily to the gross fees paid to the investment bank which, along the lines of Butler et al. (2005), are argued to be significantly related to the secondary market liquidity of the issuing firm. This insight is confirmed in an empirical analysis of a sample of 145 European SEOs. The analysis finds that gross fees are significantly lower for more liquid issuers, controlling for confounding effects. The indirect costs of an SEO largely derive from the well documented SEO discount. This discount has historically been explained with adverse selection stemming from asymmetric information. Empirically the SEO discount has been found to be positively related to firm risk, as well as the relative size of the offering. These insights are consistently confirmed in this study. Controlling for these and other relevant variables, in the small as well as the large sample (consisting of 2,065 SEOs), the SEO discount is found consistently and significantly negatively related to the secondary market liquidity of the issuing firm. This effect is closely related to the insight of Amihud and Mendelson (1986) that illiquidity is priced in the market, which leads illiquid assets to trade at a discount. Finally, it is argued that neither direct nor indirect costs should be viewed in isolation when analyzing the decision to issue equity. Rather it is the combined cost that an owner of a firm will incur if he does not subscribe to the issuance on a pro rata basis. These total costs are found to be significantly related to the secondary market liquidity of the issuing firm in an economically important way. Together these findings suggest that secondary market liquidity is a significant and important predictor of the combined cost of issuing seasoned equity and that firms should have a great interest in the market liquidity of their shares, as this may substantially affect the costs at which they can obtain additional equity.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10417/3217
Date: 2012-10-04
Pages: 135 s.
Files Size Format View
kristian_bundgaard_og_jonas_ahm.pdf 1.413Mb PDF View/Open

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record