The valence of electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) and choice of online opinion platform

Union Jack
Dannebrog

The valence of electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) and choice of online opinion platform

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Todorova, Mira Radoslavova
dc.date.accessioned 2013-07-24T06:54:57Z
dc.date.available 2013-07-24T06:54:57Z
dc.date.issued 2013-07-24
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10417/3798
dc.description.abstract Nowadays, more and more consumers are employing the online opinion platforms to share and exchange product experiences with others. Both positive and negative electronic wordof- mouth (eWOM) concerning countless number of products and services has become easily accessible to the global community, thus turning this informal communication medium into a preferred source of marketplace information. With eWOM gaining increasing popularity among consumers, it is crucial for marketers to learn how to use and harness its power. Having certain predictability of where consumers are more likely to post their positive or negative product reviews and the most influential motives lying behind their choice of online opinion platform will undoubtedly help marketers to control and even benefit from eWOM. Given the great number of online venues (e.g. product review websites, personal blogs, brand’s forums, social networking sites, etc.) that offer space for consumer thoughts, it is interesting to investigate how the users choose the eWOM platform, depending on the positive or negative nature of the feedback they want to communicate, which motivations play a role in the decision making process and what platform characteristics are taken into account. By integrating the traditional motives to engage in positive and negative eWOM with some distinctive features of a marketer-controlled vs. non-marketer controlled online opinion platforms, the current study aims to shed light into the intricacy of consumer online communication behaviour. Using an online sample of 134 consumers, the research findings confirmed that the nature of the product feedback has a significant impact on the type of website the consumer chooses as communication medium. The participants were more likely to share positive product reviews on the independent online opinion platform, while for expressing negative product feedback they preferred the brand’s website. ‘Helping the company’ emerged as the dominant motivation behind the decision to engage in positive eWOM on a third-party opinion platform, while ‘anxiety reduction’ was found to influence negative eWOM behaviour on a company’s website. The study findings contribute to our understanding of consumers’ communication behaviour in the electronic medium and provide managers with an advantage in effectively and successfully dealing with consumers’ eWOM. en_US
dc.format.extent 71 s. en_US
dc.language eng en_US
dc.subject.other Kandidatafhandlinger en_US
dc.title The valence of electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) and choice of online opinion platform en_US
dc.type mop en_US
dc.contributor.corporation Copenhagen Business School. CBS en_US
dc.contributor.corporationshort Department of Marketing. MARKETING en_US
dc.contributor.corporationshort Institut for Afsætningsøkonomi. AØ en_US
dc.contributor.department MSc in Economics & Business Administration en_US
dc.contributor.departmentshort 22 en_US
dc.description.notes Cand.merc.smc. Strategic Market Creation en_US
dc.publisher.year 2012 en_US
dc.publisher.city Frederiksberg en_US
dc.title.subtitle What role do motivations to engage in positive and negative WOM play in consumers’ platform choice en_US

Files Size Format View
mira_radoslavova_todorova.pdf 582.2Kb PDF View/Open

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record