The CCCTB Proposal and Norway

Union Jack
Dannebrog

The CCCTB Proposal and Norway

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Skjerpe, Ingeborg
dc.date.accessioned 2013-07-31T05:56:18Z
dc.date.available 2013-07-31T05:56:18Z
dc.date.issued 2013-07-31
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10417/3857
dc.description.abstract Intra-firm trade between related parties of an MNE comprise increasingly larger share of world trade. Still, the system of international taxation calculates the tax burden of such companies on the basis of separate accounting. This means that even though the foundation of the MNE is affiliation between parties, transaction s between such must be determine on an arm’s length basis. Several issues arise due to separate accounting of MNEs. Profit shifting through transfer pricing, relocation of investments, administrative cost and compliance costs are the main focus of this thesis. To alleviate parts of these issues and contribute to increased economic efficiency in the EU, the European Commission presented the CCCTB proposal in 2011. This entails a shift from separate accounting to formula apportionment with a three-factor formula of sales, labour and assets and common rules on the calculation of the tax base. By focusing on European and Norwegian MNEs and their decision to shift profits through transfer pricing and relocate investments I try to assess the implications of the CCCTB. I further seek to analyse how the Norwegian government will react to possible changes by these MNEs. I use primary expert interviews combined with secondary literature analysis of research on FA unions with a Water’s edge to assess the development of the CCCTB for the MNEs. Results from the analysis is ambiguous in the way that several factors impact the future consequence of the CCCTB. However, it seems likely that profit shifting from Norway into the CCCTB will continue compared to the current case but at a lower scale. Further, investments in the CCCTB might be seen as more attractive than in Norway due to the possibility of reduced costs as well as possibilities of intra-CCCTB consolidation. Reduced profit shifting into the CCCTB represents an increase in Norwegian welfare whereas the possibility of increased investments in the CCCTB at the expense of Norwegian investments affects Norwegian welfare negatively. It is difficult to assess the potential reaction to this by the Norwegian government but both theoretical contributions and the expert interviews emphasize that a full inclusion of Norway into the CCCTB is not very likely in the near future due to the massive alteration of the tax system as well as the deprivation of taxation as a political tool. en_US
dc.format.extent 106 s. en_US
dc.language eng en_US
dc.subject.other Kandidatafhandlinger en_US
dc.title The CCCTB Proposal and Norway en_US
dc.type mop en_US
dc.contributor.corporation Copenhagen Business School. CBS en_US
dc.contributor.corporationshort Department of International Economics and Management. INT en_US
dc.contributor.corporationshort Institut for International Økonomi og Virksomhedsledelse. INT en_US
dc.contributor.department MSc in Economics & Business Administration en_US
dc.contributor.departmentshort 22 en_US
dc.description.notes Cand.merc.ibs. International Business Studies en_US
dc.publisher.year 2012 en_US
dc.publisher.city Frederiksberg en_US
dc.title.subtitle Profit shifting, investments and implications for Norwegian Government behaviour en_US

Files Size Format View
ingeborg_skjerpe.pdf 1.503Mb PDF View/Open

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record