Multinationals’ Strategic Responses to Macro-Boycotts

Union Jack

Multinationals’ Strategic Responses to Macro-Boycotts

Show simple item record Grundmann, Frederike Nilsson, Ebba 2015-12-10T12:04:05Z 2015-12-10T12:04:05Z 2015-12-10
dc.description.abstract This research investigates how multinational companies can respond in order to limit damage caused by macro-boycotts. The research is a qualitative multiple case study and uses the Cartoon Crisis as an illustrative example. Relevant existing literature is reviewed in order to build an overview of previous research and to develop an analytical framework. Four prominent directions of damage limitation strategies are identified in the boycott literature: communication, marketing and operations, stakeholder, and internal strategies. These set the ground for the analytical framework, which will serve as structure guidance in the research. The following section gives a detailed description of three case companies and examines which strategies they used in order to limit potential damage caused by the macro-boycott known as the Cartoon Crisis. The chosen case companies are Danish multinationals operating in the dairy industry. The analysis consists of two parts, a within-case analysis and a crosscase analysis. In the within-case analysis, each case is analyzed individually and is compared to the literature review. In the cross-case analysis, the case companies are analyzed and compared to each other. Patterns, similarities, and differences among the cases are identified. The discussion includes a short assessment of the companies’ damage limitation, aspects that could affect the choice of strategies, and potential explanations why some strategies are more effective for some firms than for others. The following section outlines managerial implications, which are recommendations for macro-boycotted companies of how to limit potential damage. The recommended damage limitation strategies apply for multinationals of various sizes and include strategies such as quick response, consistency in values and behaviors, and a continuous information flow to stakeholders. Furthermore, the findings show that macro-boycotted companies should downscale its country-of-origin, make sure that knowledge about the boycotting regions is accessible, and appoint a responsible person or team for strategy formation and implementation. The researchers believe that the purpose has been fulfilled and that findings contribute to and complement the existing literature. The research has some limitations and additional research can be made to strengthen the generalizability of the implications. The macro-boycott literature is scarce and future research is needed to help companies and managers to cope with the increasing phenomenon of macroboycotts. en_US
dc.format.extent 161 en_US
dc.language eng en_US
dc.subject.other Kandidatafhandlinger en_US
dc.title Multinationals’ Strategic Responses to Macro-Boycotts en_US
dc.type mop en_US
dc.contributor.corporation Copenhagen Business School. CBS en_US
dc.contributor.corporationshort Institut for International Økonomi og Virksomhedsledelse. INT en_US
dc.contributor.corporationshort Department of International Economics and Management. INT en_US
dc.contributor.department MSc in Economics & Business Administration en_US
dc.contributor.departmentshort 22 en_US
dc.description.notes Cand.merc.ibs. International Business Studies en_US
dc.publisher.year 2015 en_US Frederiksberg en_US
dc.title.subtitle A qualitative Case Study of Damage Limitation Strategies used by Danish Boycott Targets during the Cartoon Crisis en_US

Files Size Format View
ebba_nilsson_og_frederike_grundmann.pdf 4.136Mb PDF View/Open

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record